Innovative and Sustainable Financing Mechanism for Health Promotion and Tobacco Control
About Lesson

3.3 How should the fund be governed

Introduction

Understanding the different models for managing a health promotion fund will help in identifying the most appropriate health promotion model for your country.

In this section, you will learn about the three main health promotion management models, understand the advantages and disadvantages of each model, and read case studies from countries using these models.

How is governance for these funds structured?

A health promotion fund may not be a priority or necessity for countries that receive a regular source of health promotion funding, example:

  • Singapore Health Promotion Board
  • Health Promotion Centre in the Brunei Ministry of Health

Regardless of the model used, it is important that the funding source and governance of the fund be established by legislation such as an Act of Parliament.

Expand the boxes to learn more.

How should the fund be defined and specified in the legislation

What is the fund’s

  • role
  • objectives
  • mechanism to administer fund
  • funding sources
Why should the fund be clearly defined and specified in the legislation

This is to ensure

  • fund’s transparency
  • accountability mechanisms
  • fund’s effectiveness
  • fund’s sustainability
  • no inappropriate use of funds
  • no other political interference

There are three main health promotion foundation models:

Click on the boxes to learn more.

Autonomous agency

An autonomous agency that is governed by an independent statutory body outside of the government’s bureaucratic system

Semi-autonomous agency

A semi-autonomous agency in which the fund is directed through the Ministry of Health and at the same time is administered by an independent board of governance

A unit within the government structure
A unit within a government structure where the fund is governed within a Ministry and is under the direction of the Prime Minister or the Ministry of Health

References:

  • World Health Organization. (2004). The establishment and use of dedicated taxes for health. World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific.
  • Vathesatogkit P, Yen Lian T, Ritthipakdee B. (2011). Lessons Learned In Establishing A Health Promotion Fund. Bangkok, Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance (SEATCA).
  • Vathesatogkit P, Yen Lian T, Ritthipakdee B. (2013). Health Promotion: Sustainable Financing and Governance. Bangkok, Thai Health Promotion Foundation (ThaiHealth).
  • World Health Organization. (2016). Earmarked Tobacco Taxes: Lessons Learnt from Nine Countries. World Health Organization. Geneva.
Course Content
Module 3 : Making a Case for a Health Promotion Fund
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nullam nec ante eget nunc egestas hendrerit. Integer fermentum justo eu libero pulvinar, ut aliquet nunc semper. Maecenas ut velit nec neque ultrices laoreet. Fusce in odio vel arcu hendrerit euismod. Pellentesque non arcu id tellus bibendum pharetra. Vivamus non odio eu libero vulputate gravida ac ac libero. Sed placerat bibendum dolor, vel eleifend dui efficitur vel. Maecenas vel facilisis mi. Fusce dictum lacinia risus id dapibus.

0% complete

0 /11